Company Employment Letter

white moon @ 2009-10-10T10: 59:00

"... are retracted its demand for more children and higher-& & &%%% for children. In view of the federal budget deficit &&&&- must be saved. "

As if you have not known that before. But I knew it * lol *. What is one to choose if all contents of the election period may be regarded as void officially (for now is still not a crime, right? But if it should be ..). by hook all parties that had not previously ruled, in which there is still hope for honesty? The list would therefore be shorter by one.

Fox also have me the importance that investment in children = the general public. Best example: the children of premium (actually long-term increase in child benefit) versus the scrapping.

The long-overdue increase in child benefit (inflation etc) was

• after long, heated debate about the feasibility of a permanent increase
• to the single premium in the amount
• he set of 100 €,

although money would benefit in this area of general purchasing power, ie the full range of market and trade.

other hand, a car-scrapping

• in a "rapid action closed action"
• decided in the amount of 2500 €.

although

• the scrapping is a unique flash in the pan, for anyone in the next few years would somehow buy a car, did it now, that is, after several years must necessarily be higher ere lull reign as ever, right?
• only the scrapping of the auto industry, and mostly not even the local "benefit" (? Above) came.
• the scrapping will be used only by the population shift was that anyway had the remaining € 15,000 upwards for a new car available.

This is good economic sense, right?

PS Why can admire besides my journal either yellow-rotten teeth or stomach, no one wants to see,?